home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
-
-
-
- Reported Brian Lloyd/Telebit
-
- PPPEXT Minutes
-
- Noel Chiappa opened the Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions meeting and
- then handed it over to Brian Lloyd, the new Working Group Chair.
-
- There was an early observation that no router vendors (other than
- Telebit) appeared to be present. This curtailed discussion of
- synchronous PPP. Most of the discussion that followed tended to address
- the needs/desires of the asynchronous PPP community.
-
- The current list of documents was discussed. Here is the list of
- current documents:
-
- RFC 1171 RFC 1172
-
-
- o LCP draft Simpson
- o IPCP draft McGregor
- o Appletalk Parken - hold waiting for Appletalk wg
- o ISO/CLNP Katz/Simpson - no interest yet?
- o DECnet 4 Senum - not much said
- o SNAP B? - no interest
- o LLC Harvey - no interest
- o Bridging Baker - already an RFC
- o 32 bit FCS Harvey - general approval - no known implementations
- o Authentication Lloyd/Simpson - most discussion here
- o MIB Kastenholz - no implementations
-
-
- Consensus indicated that the lcp and ipcp draft documents (these will
- supercede RFC 1171 and 1172 respectively) should proceed to the next
- level since there are numerous interoperable implementations. Bill
- Simpson will make very minor changes to his document and republish it.
-
- None of the other documents were deemed ready to progress to the next
- level because of either a) lack of further interest, or b) no
- implementations.
-
- Consensus also indicated a need for a catalog document to keep track of
- all the PPP related documents. Brian Lloyd is working on that.
-
- Discussion was heavy on the new Lloyd/Simpson authentication protocol
- document that describes the Password Authentication Protocol (PAP) and
- the Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP). There was a
- discussion of where authentication should go. It was decided that
- link-level authentication in the Link Control Protocol (LCP) is
- acceptable so long as additional authentication may be used within the
- Upper Layer Protocols (ULPs -- NCP or higher).
-
- 1
-
-
-
-
-
- Strong discussion indicated a need for a mechanism to allow a called PPP
- system to indicate to its peer that it wishes to close the link and
- dial-back for purposes of authentication. This information was referred
- back to Simpson and Lloyd to research and add to the authentication
- document.
-
- It was decided that the proper digest algorithm for CHAP should be MD5.
- As a result it was decided that references to MD2 and MD4 should be
- removed from the document.
-
- James Galvin representing the Security Area Advisory Group (SAAG)
- Working Group strongly recommended adding a section on distribution of
- the ``secret'' used in CHAP.
-
- More information is needed in the authentication document about bit and
- octet ordering and character sets used (in the case of legible passwords
- and secrets).
-
- More detail is needed about the PAP message reply.
-
- CHAP needs a mechanism (besides dropping the link) to indicate that the
- authentication has succeeded or failed. This is because some system
- will require the user to enter the secret value in real time so there
- may be errors and hence retries.
-
- The size of the secret value was increased from 64 to 128 bits.
-
- The challenge needs to be non-repeating. The document needs to discuss
- methods of generating good challenges.
-
- The document should also remove all references to encryption.
-
- The last item of the day was to generate a list of recommended PPP
- options to go into the router requirements document. The final list of
- suggested options for sync implementations:
-
-
- o Support for the Link Quality Monitoring (LQM) option.
- o Support for the magic number (loopback detection) option.
- o No address/control field compression.
- o No protocol field compression.
-
-
- For Async Implementations:
-
-
- o Do address/control field compression.
- o Do protocol field compression.
-
-
-
- 2
-
-
-
-
-
- Attendees
-
- James Barnes barnes@xylogics.com
- Gregory Bruell gob@shiva.com
- Philip Budne phil@shiva.com
- Randy Butler rbutler@ncsa.uiuc.edu
- Cerafin Castillo cec@emulex.com
- Richard Cherry rcherry@novell.com
- Gary Ellis garye@hpspd.spd.hp.com
- Arlan Finestead arlanf@ncsa.uiuc.edu
- James Galvin galvin@tis.com
- Robert Griffioen
- Jack Hahn hahn@umd5.umd.edu
- Russ Hobby rdhobby@ucdavis.edu
- Ron Jacoby rj@sgi.com
- Frank Kastenholz kasten@europa.clearpoint.com
- Tom Kessler kessler@sun.com
- Kenneth Key key@cs.utk.edu
- Mark Knopper mak@merit.edu
- Anthony Lauck lauck@tl.enet.dec.com
- Joshua Littlefield josh@cayman.com
- Brian Lloyd brian@telebit.com
- Glenn McGregor ghm@merit.edu
- Bradford Parker brad@cayman.com
- Mike Petry petry@ni.umd.edu
- Richard Smith smiddy@pluto.dss.com
- Bruce Taber taber@interlan.com
- Theodore Tso
- John Veizades veizades@apple.com
- Preston Wilson preston@i88.isc.com
- L. Michele Wright uncng!michele@uunet.uu.net
- Joseph Zur fibrontics!zur@uunet.uu.net
-
-
-
- 3
-